Do we really need 10,000 steps a day? What the research says

The Conversation looks at where the 10,000-step goal came from and what the research says, checked claim by claim. Some of the study figures could not be confirmed independently.

ArticlePublished Oct 15Original source · theconversation.com

Start 7-day free trial

claims in 26 statements

20 confirmed
18 need review
1 needs re-check

Published by the Pikaan team. This review is read-only, and reading it uses no credits.

Claims and sources

Every claim in the source, in order. The summary under each claim is written by AI from its sources; open the sources to check it.

Claim 1 of 39Confirmed

Factual claim · Statement 1 of 26 · 95% confidence
AI summary
Independent sources including the Los Angeles Times and ScienceDaily confirm that the 10,000-step goal traces to a 1960s Japanese pedometer called the Manpo-kei, whose name is widely rendered in English as "10,000-step meter" (or "10,000 steps meter"). The stated origin and translation both match the evidence.
Saved source links3latimes.com · sciencedaily.com · independent.co.uk
Factual claim · 97% confidence
Statement 1 of 26
The 10,000 steps a day recommendation came from a Japanese pedometer called the manpo-kei.
AI summary
The BBC, the American Heart Association, Dictionary.com and The Conversation all independently state that the Japanese pedometer name manpo-kei translates as "10,000-step meter" (万歩計 = 10,000 + step + meter). The translation is uncontested across these sources.
Saved source links3bbc.com · heart.org · theconversation.com
Factual claim
Statement 2 of 26
The pedometer went on sale just after the 1964 Tokyo Olympics.
AI summary
The specific claim that there was a growing worry people in Japan weren't moving enough comes only from the input article itself (The Conversation), which cannot independently confirm its own assertion. An independent academic source notes that the 1964 Tokyo Olympics left a legacy of increased interest in exercise and that physical-activity promotion policies appeared around this time, which is consistent with but does not establish the particular worry about insufficient movement.
These links belong to the claim, but no exact sentence was found on their pages. Review the sources before relying on this result.
Saved source links1academic.oup.com
- Physical Activity, Sport, and Health in Japanacademic.oup.com(opens in a new tab)
Factual claim · Statement 3 of 26
AI summary
Business Insider reports that the number 'was chosen because it was both catchy and easy to remember,' and Gigazine states 'the main reason the number 10,000 was chosen was because it was easy to remember and convenient for advertising.' News18 and Mic likewise attribute the figure to a 1965 Japanese pedometer marketing campaign (Manpo-kei) rather than scientific research, confirming the choice was driven by memorability and marketability.
These links belong to the claim, but no exact sentence was found on their pages. Review the sources before relying on this result.
Saved source links1mic.com
- Why is 10k the magic number of steps?www.mic.com(opens in a new tab)
Factual claim · Statement 4 of 26
AI summary
The identification is correct: dictionary entries at Kakimashou and kanji.jepang.org list 万 as the Japanese kanji meaning ten thousand (10,000). The second half — that it "looks a little like a walking person" — is a subjective visual impression rather than a checkable fact; the same colorful description appears in the source article and a LinkedIn post, but no authoritative source establishes the resemblance as anything more than a loose mnemonic impression, and the character is also the shinjitai variant of 萬.
These links belong to the claim, but no exact sentence was found on their pages. Review the sources before relying on this result.
Saved source links1kakimashou.com
- 万 - Kakimashouwww.kakimashou.com(opens in a new tab)
Factual claim
Statement 4 of 26
The Japanese kanji character for 10,000 – 万 – looks a little like a walking person.
AI summary
Several sources on the manpo-kei pedometer say the kanji 万 looks like a person walking and that this may have influenced the choice of 10,000. The GVLT article and the note.com pieces describe it as a suggested or anecdotal theory, matching the claim's hedged wording.
This passage repeats the speaker's own words. It shows the words were said, not that they are true.
Matching passages1theconversation.com
- Do we really need 10000 steps a day?theconversation.com(opens in a new tab)
Factual claim · Statement 5 of 26 · 96% confidence
AI summary
Independent sources — Medical Xpress, McGill University's Office for Science and Society, Scientific American, the Los Angeles Times and the American Heart Association — all report that the 10,000-step target began as a marketing slogan for the 1960s Japanese Manpo-kei pedometer, with no scientific basis at the time. The Conversation article itself states the same, and no source disputes this origin.
Saved source links6medicalxpress.com · mcgill.ca · scientificamerican.com
Factual claim · Statement 6 of 26 · 93% confidence
AI summary
The Lancet Public Health systematic review by Ding et al. (published 23 July 2025) states that 57 studies from 35 cohorts were included, and that the all-cause mortality analysis covered 161,176 participants; the journal's press release describes the work as a study analysing data from over 160,000 adults on daily steps and a wide range of health outcomes. This matches the article's description of a recent systematic review combining 57 studies and more than 160,000 adults.
Saved source links3pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · thelancet.com · eurekalert.org
Reported claim · Statement 7 of 26
AI summary
The Lancet Public Health review (Ding et al., 2025) found benefits largely plateaued around 7,000 steps for most outcomes, but this is not a universal maximum: the BBC reports that walking further was still linked to reduced dementia risk, and Harvard notes that taking up to 10,000 steps led to even better outcomes, with the extra gains described as modest rather than zero.
These links belong to the claim, but no exact sentence was found on their pages. Review the sources before relying on this result.
Saved source links4bbc.com · health.harvard.edu · npr.org
Factual claim · Statement 8 of 26 · 95% confidence
AI summary
The American College of Cardiology and Harvard Health both report that a review of 57 studies found 7,000 daily steps associated with a 47% lower risk of all-cause mortality compared with 2,000 steps. US News/HealthDay and India Today independently report the same 47% figure, confirming the claim as stated.
Saved source links4acc.org · health.harvard.edu · usnews.com
Factual claim
Statement 8 of 26
Reaching 7,000 steps a day was linked to a 47% lower risk of dying early.
AI summary
The available sources were not specific enough for a confident result.
These links belong to the claim, but no exact sentence was found on their pages. Review the sources before relying on this result.
Saved source links3pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Factual claim
Statement 8 of 26
Reaching 7,000 steps a day was linked to a 47% lower risk of dying early.
AI summary
The available sources were not specific enough for a confident result.
Pikaan found this exact sentence on the publisher's page. Finding it does not show whether it supports or contradicts the claim.
Matching passages2pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Physical Activity Over the Adult Life Course and Risk of ... - PMCpmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov(opens in a new tab)
- Influence of leisure activity on the incidence of Alzheimer's Diseasepmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov(opens in a new tab)
Factual claim · Statement 9 of 26 · 90% confidence
AI summary
Independent reports on the Ding et al. Meta-analysis show meaningful health gains well below 7,000 steps: NPR states that moving from 2,000 to 4,000 steps a day was accompanied by nearly a 36% lower risk of dying, and Medimap.ca similarly notes 4,000 steps already carried a 36% lower risk of death compared with 2,000. This confirms that some benefits begin before the 7,000-step mark.
Saved source links3medimap.ca · npr.org · pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Factual claim · Statement 10 of 26 · 88% confidence
AI summary
NPR's coverage of Melody Ding's review of more than 160,000 adults reports that simply jumping from 2,000 to 4,000 steps in a day was accompanied by nearly a 36% lower risk of dying, and ScienceDaily's account of the same 57-study review quotes the authors saying such an increase is 'associated with significant health gain.' Independent reporting on the underlying research therefore supports the article's statement that going from about 2,000 to 4,000 steps a day makes a real difference.
Saved source links2npr.org · sciencedaily.com
- Counting steps for health? Here's how many you really needwww.npr.org(opens in a new tab)
- 7000 steps a day cuts death risk by 47%—and that might be all you ...www.sciencedaily.com(opens in a new tab)
Factual claim · Statement 11 of 26 · 90% confidence
AI summary
The Conversation's claim restates the findings of a large systematic review of 57 studies and more than 160,000 adults, and independent outlets corroborate it. ABC News reports that health benefits increased with every 1,000-step increment but 'after 7,000 steps, these benefits tended to level off,' and the American College of Sports Medicine describes risk declining steeply at first and then leveling off at higher step counts.
Saved source links4theconversation.com · abc.net.au · acsm.org
Factual claim · Statement 12 of 26
AI summary
A peer-reviewed review in PMC states the dose-response relationship is curvilinear and that the proportionately greatest benefits come from progressing from being inactive to moderate activity levels, and Harvard Health likewise reports the greatest health benefits and steepest reductions in heart-disease risk occur when people transition from inactive to active even if still below guideline levels.
These links belong to the claim, but no exact sentence was found on their pages. Review the sources before relying on this result.
Saved source links1pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › articles › PMC10541051The role of physical activity in obesity: let's actively ...pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov(opens in a new tab)
Factual claim · Statement 13 of 26 · 88% confidence
AI summary
The claim matches the dose-response evidence: benefit curves are curvilinear, with the largest gains from inactivity to moderate activity and diminishing relative gains at higher levels. The WHO 2020 guidelines state that 'more physical activity is better, although the relative benefits tend to diminish at higher levels,' and the US Physical Activity Guidelines evidence portfolio describes the greatest benefit occurring early in the dose-response relationship.
Saved source links2bjsm.bmj.com · psychiatrist.com
- World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviourbjsm.bmj.com(opens in a new tab)
- Physical Exercise and Health, 2: Benefits of Different Levels and ...www.psychiatrist.com(opens in a new tab)
Factual claim · Statement 14 of 26 · 97% confidence
AI summary
Cleveland Clinic lists walking among examples of aerobic exercise and calls it "one of the simplest and most available aerobic exercises," while Mayo Clinic states "walking is a great choice for aerobic exercise" and Harvard's Nutrition Source says walking "meets this aerobic component." An NHS cardiac rehabilitation page states plainly that "walking is a type of aerobic exercise."
Saved source links4my.clevelandclinic.org · mayoclinic.org · nutritionsource.hsph.harvard.edu
Factual claim · Statement 15 of 26 · 95% confidence
AI summary
Harvard's Nutrition Source states plainly that walking "is a type of cardiovascular physical activity, which increases your heart rate," and the American Heart Association lists walking among endurance activities that increase breathing and heart rate. NHS cardiac rehabilitation guidance likewise describes walking as aerobic exercise that raises heart rate during the conditioning phase.
Saved source links2nutritionsource.hsph.harvard.edu · cuh.nhs.uk
- Walking for Exercise - The Nutrition Source - Harvard Universitynutritionsource.hsph.harvard.edu(opens in a new tab)
- Cardiac rehabilitation walking guidelines and programmewww.cuh.nhs.uk(opens in a new tab)
Factual claim
Statement 15 of 26
Walking raises heart rate.
AI summary
The Conversation's article defines walking as aerobic exercise that 'raises your heart rate and places stress on your respiratory, muscular and cardiovascular systems,' and this is corroborated independently by a peer-reviewed review (PMC6060191) describing walking as an ambulatory activity that stresses neuromuscular and cardiorespiratory systems, and by PMC10643563 on walking's circulatory and cardiopulmonary effects. 'Stress' here is used in the exercise-physiology sense of physiological load, not harm.
These links belong to the claim, but no exact sentence was found on their pages. Review the sources before relying on this result.
Saved source links2pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Physiological determinants of walking effort in older adultspmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov(opens in a new tab)
- The multifaceted benefits of walking for healthy aging: from Blue Zones to molecular mechanismspmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov(opens in a new tab)
Factual claim · Statement 16 of 26 · 95% confidence
AI summary
Mayo Clinic states that regular brisk walking can prevent or manage heart disease, high blood pressure and type 2 diabetes and improve heart health, while Harvard's Nutrition Source notes walking is associated with improving blood pressure and body mass index and lowering the risk of diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Cleveland Clinic and the American Heart Association likewise report that walking improves heart health and blood sugar control, so the claim is well supported.
Saved source links4health.clevelandclinic.org · mayoclinic.org · nutritionsource.hsph.harvard.edu
Factual claim · 90% confidence
Statement 16 of 26
Regular walking can improve heart and metabolic health.
AI summary
Cleveland Clinic, Mayo Clinic, and the NHS all state that regular walking can help with weight loss and weight management by burning calories, and Mayo Clinic notes that adding 30 minutes of brisk walking daily could burn about 150 extra calories. The sources add the context that walking is most effective for weight loss when combined with a healthy, calorie-controlled diet, but the claim that regular walking can reduce body weight is well supported.
Saved source links4health.clevelandclinic.org · mayoclinic.org · nhs.uk
Factual claim · Statement 17 of 26 · 90% confidence
AI summary
Kaiser Permanente states walking "helps relieve stress, ease symptoms of anxiety and depression," and the Cleveland Clinic lists reduced stress among walking's benefits. A peer-reviewed study in PMC found guided walking significantly reduced state stress and anxiety scores, and WebMD and the Royal College of Podiatry likewise tie walking to stress relief and better mood.
Saved source links5healthy.kaiserpermanente.org · health.clevelandclinic.org · pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Factual claim · 85% confidence
Statement 17 of 26
Walking can also reduce stress and improve mental health.
AI summary
Multiple independent sources, including a NIH review and mental health organizations, report that regular walking and exercise improve mental health and self-esteem, and a NIH review lists self-efficacy as a proposed mechanism. The claim's hedged wording ('possibly') aligns with this evidence.
Saved source links3pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · mentalhealth.org.uk · webmd.com
Factual claim · Statement 18 of 26
AI summary
The sentence is the source article's own assertion, so it cannot independently confirm itself, and the independent research located does not settle how most people actually walk. A PMC review of walking cadence notes 100 steps/minute is generally sufficient for moderate intensity but also cites a study in which only 45% of adults reached the 3-MET moderate-intensity threshold, and the other sources describe brisk walking as moderate-intensity without establishing what pace most people choose.
These links belong to the claim, but no exact sentence was found on their pages. Review the sources before relying on this result.
Saved source links1pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Walking Cadence to Exercise at Moderate Intensity for Adults - PMCpmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov(opens in a new tab)
Factual claim · Statement 19 of 26
AI summary
The CDC's physical activity report says people who exercise at greater duration or more vigorous intensity are likely to derive greater benefit, and WHO guidelines treat vigorous activity as time-efficient relative to moderate activity, so intensity clearly raises benefit per minute. But WHO also reports the relative benefits diminish at higher activity levels and that the point of diminishing returns cannot be specified, and a Harvard Health review found that regardless of intensity any movement is good and no single intensity came out ahead for long-term outcomes, so the claim is broadly true but oversimplified.
These links belong to the claim, but no exact sentence was found on their pages. Review the sources before relying on this result.
Saved source links3pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · health.ucdavis.edu · health.harvard.edu
Factual claim · Statement 20 of 26 · 97% confidence
AI summary
The CDC's Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (2nd edition) states that 75 minutes of vigorous-intensity activity a week is roughly equivalent to 150 minutes of moderate-intensity activity a week, and CDC, NHS, and WHO guidance pages present the same 150-minute moderate / 75-minute vigorous equivalence. This matches the claim about official guidelines.
Saved source links4cdc.gov · nhs.uk · emro.who.int
Reported claim · Statement 21 of 26
AI summary
Dated research coverage (BBC Future on VILPA, National Geographic, Harvard Health, and the European Heart Journal press release) consistently reports that short, vigorous bursts of activity spread through the day are associated with meaningful health benefits, such as a ~40% lower risk of premature death from three to four one-minute bouts daily in one 2022 study. The sources agree such findings have been a recurring theme of recent research, matching the claim's assertion.
These links belong to the claim, but no exact sentence was found on their pages. Review the sources before relying on this result.
Saved source links6bbc.com · nationalgeographic.com · health.harvard.edu
Factual claim · Statement 22 of 26
AI summary
A companion exercise-science article notes that anaerobic fitness relates to short bursts of high-intensity movement and is 'influenced by muscle mass, strength, and explosive power,' and other fitness sources say anaerobic exercise builds muscle mass, strength and power. However, the same sources define anaerobic fitness primarily as the oxygen-independent energy system for brief maximal efforts (peak anaerobic power and muscular endurance), so muscle mass, strength and power are influences or outcomes rather than what anaerobic fitness literally refers to.
These links belong to the claim, but no exact sentence was found on their pages. Review the sources before relying on this result.
Saved source links3theconversation.com · pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · eufic.org
Factual claim · Statement 23 of 26
AI summary
Independent reviews do link muscle strength — which this article defines as part of 'anaerobic fitness' — with better survival in older adults, and physical activity generally with improved quality of life in the elderly (PMC7739320, ICFSR consensus). However, the evidence base overwhelmingly concerns aerobic/cardiorespiratory fitness and total physical activity, and one cohort study found anaerobic power was not related to activity and that lifelong endurance training did not preserve muscle strength or power, so the specific link claimed for anaerobic fitness is only partly and indirectly supported.
These links belong to the claim, but no exact sentence was found on their pages. Review the sources before relying on this result.
Saved source links4pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Factual claim · Statement 24 of 26 · 92% confidence
AI summary
Major health authorities including the CDC, WHO EMRO, Mayo Clinic, NIDDK, and NIH MedlinePlus all state that adults should do muscle-strengthening activities such as lifting weights at least two days each week. This matches the claim's guidance exactly.
Saved source links4cdc.gov · niddk.nih.gov · emro.who.int
Factual claim · 90% confidence
Statement 25 of 26
Muscle-strengthening activities help reduce your risk of type 2 diabetes.
AI summary
The NHS strength-and-flexibility guidance states that exercises improving leg strength, balance and co-ordination can help people 'avoid falls as they get older' and that muscle-strengthening activities 'can also help reduce your chances of falling.' The NIH National Institute on Aging likewise states muscle-strengthening exercise is 'key to maintaining existing strength. And helping to prevent falls and fall-related injuries,' and Harvard Health describes muscles as the 'first line of defense against falls.'
Saved source links2nia.nih.gov · health.harvard.edu
- Three Types of Exercise Can Improve Your Health and Physical Abilitywww.nia.nih.gov(opens in a new tab)
- Prevent falls and immobility: Start with these strength- ...www.health.harvard.edu(opens in a new tab)
Factual claim · 91% confidence
Statement 25 of 26
Muscle-strengthening activities help reduce your risk of type 2 diabetes.
AI summary
The U.S. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion lists muscle-strengthening activity as one of the three activity types that help older adults stay independent, and the National Institute on Aging states these activities 'improve physical function and can help you stay independent.' MedlinePlus and Canada's public-health guidance give the same conclusion.
Saved source links3odphp.health.gov · nia.nih.gov · canada.ca
Factual claim · Statement 26 of 26 · 72% confidence
AI summary
The Conversation article and independent medical sources agree that 7,000 daily steps capture most measurable health gains (a 57-study review found benefits maximise and then plateau around 7,000 steps), and Mayo Clinic, NIDDK and the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans all recommend muscle-strengthening activity at least two days per week. The advice therefore aligns with established public-health guidance, though the phrase 'most of your bases' remains a general, hedged framing rather than a precise measurable standard.
Saved source links4theconversation.com · mayoclinic.org · niddk.nih.gov

Review your own source

Check your own videos, articles and documents the same way: every claim, its state and its sources. Starter includes a 7-day free trial. Cancel before it ends and you are not charged.

Claims and sources

1ConfirmedAI verdict: Supported · 95% confidenceThe 10,000 steps a day recommendation came from a Japanese pedometer called the manpo-kei.3

AI summary

2ConfirmedAI verdict: Supported · 97% confidenceManpo-kei translates to "10,000-step meter".3

Statement 1 of 26

AI summary

3Needs reviewAI verdict: InconclusiveThe pedometer went on sale just after the 1964 Tokyo Olympics.

AI summary

Sources unavailable

4Needs reviewAI verdict: InconclusiveThere was a growing worry people in Japan weren't moving enough around the time of the 1964 Tokyo Olympics.1

Statement 2 of 26

AI summary

5Needs reviewAI verdict: SupportedThe number 10,000 was mainly chosen because it was catchy and easy to remember.1

AI summary

6Needs reviewAI verdict: MixedThe Japanese kanji character for 10,000 – 万 – looks a little like a walking person.1

AI summary

7Needs reviewAI verdict: SupportedThe resemblance of the kanji character to a walking person may have played a role in deciding on the number 10,000.1

Statement 4 of 26

AI summary

8ConfirmedAI verdict: Supported · 96% confidence10,000 was a slogan to sell a step-counter, not an evidence-based recommendation.6

AI summary

9ConfirmedAI verdict: Supported · 93% confidenceA recently published systematic review combined the results of 57 studies and more than 160,000 adults to examine the relationship between daily steps and health.3

AI summary

10Needs reviewAI verdict: Quote not confirmedThey found 7,000 steps a day was where health benefits were maximised.4

AI summary

11ConfirmedAI verdict: Supported · 95% confidenceReaching 7,000 steps a day was linked to a 47% lower risk of dying early.4

AI summary

12Needs reviewAI verdict: InconclusiveReaching 7,000 steps a day was linked to a 25% lower risk of cardiovascular disease (heart disease and stroke).

Statement 8 of 26

AI summary

Sources unavailable

13Needs reviewAI verdict: InconclusiveReaching 7,000 steps a day was linked to a 14% lower risk of type 2 diabetes.3

Statement 8 of 26

AI summary

14Needs reviewAI verdict: InconclusiveReaching 7,000 steps a day was linked to a 38% lower risk of dementia.2

Statement 8 of 26

AI summary

15Needs reviewAI verdict: InconclusiveReaching 7,000 steps a day was linked to a 22% lower risk of depression.

Statement 8 of 26

Sources unavailable

16Needs reviewAI verdict: InconclusiveReaching 7,000 steps a day was linked to a 28% lower risk of falls.

Statement 8 of 26

Sources unavailable

17ConfirmedAI verdict: Supported · 90% confidenceSome health benefits started well before 7,000 steps.3

AI summary

18ConfirmedAI verdict: Supported · 88% confidenceThe researchers found going from about 2,000 to 4,000 steps a day makes a real difference.2

AI summary

19ConfirmedAI verdict: Supported · 90% confidenceThese health benefits then increase again slightly from 4,000 to 7,000 steps a day, after which the benefits start to plateau.4

AI summary

20Needs reviewAI verdict: SupportedGoing from being inactive to moderately active yields the largest health improvements.1

AI summary

21ConfirmedAI verdict: Supported · 88% confidenceMoving from a moderate to high level of activity provides additional benefits that are much smaller in magnitude.2

AI summary

22ConfirmedAI verdict: Supported · 97% confidenceWalking is a form of aerobic exercise.4

AI summary

23ConfirmedAI verdict: Supported · 95% confidenceWalking raises heart rate.2

AI summary

24Needs reviewAI verdict: SupportedWalking places stress on respiratory, muscular and cardiovascular systems.2

Statement 15 of 26

AI summary

25ConfirmedAI verdict: Supported · 95% confidenceRegular walking can improve heart and metabolic health.4

AI summary

26ConfirmedAI verdict: Supported · 90% confidenceRegular walking can reduce bodyweight.4

Statement 16 of 26

AI summary

27ConfirmedAI verdict: Supported · 90% confidenceWalking can also reduce stress and improve mental health.5

AI summary

28ConfirmedAI verdict: Supported · 85% confidenceWalking can improve mental health possibly due to improvements in feelings of self-esteem and self-efficacy that comes with regular movement.3

Statement 17 of 26

AI summary

29Needs reviewAI verdict: InconclusiveMost people choose a walking pace that pushes them into the realm of “moderate intensity” exercise.1

AI summary

30Needs reviewAI verdict: MixedThe health benefits of exercise scale up with exercise intensity.3

AI summary

31ConfirmedAI verdict: Supported · 97% confidenceOfficial exercise guidelines treat 75 minutes of vigorous activity as roughly equal to 150 minutes of moderate activity.4

AI summary

32Needs reviewAI verdict: Accurately quotedRecent research suggests short bursts of high-intensity exercise spread across the day can have surprising health benefits.6

AI summary

33Needs reviewAI verdict: MixedAnaerobic fitness refers to muscle mass, muscle strength, and power.3

AI summary